How to Find Decision-Makers in APAC Without LinkedIn

LinkedIn penetration in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand is a fraction of Singapore's. Most mid-market APAC decision-makers don't maintain meaningful LinkedIn profiles. This guide covers 6 methods to find them — from local registries to regional job platforms to local-language trade press.

How to Find Decision-Makers in APAC Without LinkedIn
Created by Canva AI
Quick Answer
How do you find decision-makers in APAC without LinkedIn?

Six methods that work: (1) Local business registries — AHU (Indonesia), SSM (Malaysia), ACRA (Singapore), DBD (Thailand), DART (South Korea), NTA (Japan) list directors and registered officers by company; (2) Regional job platforms — the decision-maker hiring the role is often identifiable from the job posting itself; (3) Local-language trade press — executives named in deal and partnership announcements; (4) Industry associations and chamber membership directories — especially powerful in Japan and South Korea; (5) Company websites in local language — "About Us" and leadership pages in Vietnamese, Bahasa Indonesia, or Thai often name contacts absent from LinkedIn; (6) Local-source data platforms like Pubrio — which index all of the above and return verified contacts for mid-market APAC companies that do not appear in Apollo, ZoomInfo, or LinkedIn-based tools.

6.9%
Of global LinkedIn members are in Southeast Asia — despite the region generating 78% of global B2B e-commerce GMV. The gap between LinkedIn coverage and market size is structural
2–3x
More contacts found when APAC searches include native-language job titles — "Head of Procurement" in Japanese, Korean, or Vietnamese returns a substantially larger result set than English alone
50%
LinkedIn population penetration in Singapore — the highest in APAC. Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand are a fraction of this, making non-LinkedIn methods essential for those markets
120K+
Daily Expansion Signals Pubrio generates from local APAC registries, job boards, and trade press — surfacing decision-maker context where LinkedIn returns nothing

LinkedIn has 323 million members in APAC — yet Southeast Asia accounts for only 6.9% of global LinkedIn membership. Singapore has approximately 50% LinkedIn population penetration. Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand are a fraction of that.

The consequence: a sales team targeting mid-market manufacturers in Vietnam, logistics firms in Indonesia, or healthcare companies in Thailand with a LinkedIn-first prospecting workflow is working from a list that misses the majority of its addressable market. The decision-makers exist. They are just not on LinkedIn — or they have bare-bones profiles that tell you nothing useful.

Six methods find them where they actually are.


Method 1 — Local business registries

Every APAC country maintains an official business registry that lists company directors, registered officers, and in some cases shareholders. These are legal documents — the names are verified, current, and authoritative. For many mid-market APAC companies, the registry is the only publicly available source for decision-maker identity.

By market:

  • Indonesia: AHU (Administrasi Hukum Umum) — lists directors (Direktur) and commissioners for every PT company
  • Malaysia: SSM (Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia) — lists directors for Sdn Bhd and Bhd entities
  • Singapore: ACRA — lists directors and shareholders for all registered companies
  • Thailand: DBD (Department of Business Development) — lists juristic persons and authorized directors
  • South Korea: DART — financial disclosures name executives and board members
  • Japan: NTA Corporate Number database — combined with company registry filings for director information
  • India: MCA (Ministry of Corporate Affairs) — lists directors for all registered companies

From the registry, you get the name. From there: cross-reference the company website (often in local language), local-language trade press, and regional job platform postings to find contact details or infer the email format.


Method 2 — Regional job platforms

The decision-maker is often identifiable from the job posting they approve or that reports to them. A company posting "VP of Sales — report to COO" on Naukri (India) tells you the COO exists and is active. A company posting "Compliance Manager — report to CFO" on Kalibrr (Philippines) tells you who owns the compliance budget.

Key platforms by market:

  • India: Naukri, TimesJobs (70M+ registered jobseekers on Naukri alone)
  • Indonesia: Kalibrr, Glints, JobStreet
  • Vietnam: Vietnamworks, TopCV
  • Thailand: JobsDB, JobThai
  • South Korea: JobKorea, Saramin
  • Japan: Rikunabi, Mynavi, Doda
  • Taiwan: 104 Job Bank
  • MENA: Bayt, GulfTalent

Beyond identifying seniority levels, job postings reveal the technology stack a company uses, the team structure, and often the direct hiring manager's name in the "who you'll work with" section. This is contact intelligence that English-language databases cannot produce for these markets.


Method 3 — Local-language trade press

Partnership announcements, executive interviews, and deal closures in APAC markets are covered first in local-language trade press — before they reach LinkedIn, Crunchbase, or English-language business media.

By market:

  • Vietnam: Nhip Cau Dau Tu, VnExpress Business, CafeF — name executives by title in deal coverage
  • Indonesia: Kontan, Bisnis Indonesia — executive interviews and partnership announcements with full names
  • Thailand: Krungthep Turakij, Prachachat Turakij — business news covering mid-market and enterprise deals
  • South Korea: The Bell, Hankyung — covers tech and finance executive movements
  • Japan: Nikkei Business, Diamond Online — executive profiles and deal coverage
  • India: The Ken, VCCircle, Entrackr — covers funded company executives by name

A Google search in the local language — "ประธาน [company name] Thailand" or "direktur [company name] Indonesia" — frequently surfaces executive names in local press that do not appear in any English-language tool. This method is manual but produces contacts for companies that are completely invisible to standard databases.


Method 4 — Industry associations and chamber directories

Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan have active industry associations and chambers of commerce that publish member directories — often including company name, representative name, and contact details. These are authoritative, current, and entirely outside LinkedIn's coverage.

High-value examples:

  • Japan: JETRO (Japan External Trade Organization) — member directories by industry; Tokyo Chamber of Commerce
  • South Korea: KITA (Korea International Trade Association) — lists company representatives by sector
  • Singapore: Singapore Business Federation, Singapore Chamber of Commerce — member directories
  • Taiwan: TEEMA (Taiwan Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers' Association) — sector-specific contacts
  • India: CII (Confederation of Indian Industry), NASSCOM — technology sector membership lists

For enterprise accounts in Japan especially, where nemawashi means the key stakeholders are often not the publicly visible executives, association membership gives you a different entry point — the industry-facing representative who manages external relationships.


Method 5 — Company websites in local language

This one is underused and consistently productive. The same company that has a bare English-language LinkedIn profile or a sparse Crunchbase entry often has a detailed local-language website with a full "About Us" page, leadership team photos, and named executives.

Search the company name in the local language through Google, adding "leadership," "management," or "director" in the local language. For Indonesia: "[company name] direksi" or "[company name] manajemen." For Vietnam: "[company name] ban lãnh đạo." For Thailand: "[company name] ผู้บริหาร."

The local-language version of a company's digital presence is almost always more informative than the English-language version for mid-market APAC companies. The decision-maker names you find here are often absent from every English-language data tool.


Method 6 — Local-source data platforms

The five methods above are manual. For teams building APAC prospect lists at scale, Pubrio systematically indexes all of them — local business registries, regional job platforms, local-language trade press, and company website data — across 130+ countries.

When you search for a mid-market logistics company in Indonesia in Pubrio, the contact record draws from local business registries, regional job platforms, local-language trade press, and company website data — not from LinkedIn or English-language web crawls. The result is a verified decision-maker contact for a company that returns empty in Apollo, ZoomInfo, and every LinkedIn-based tool.

1B+ profiles from 50+ local registries and regional sources across 130+ countries. The Expansion Signal layer surfaces 120,000+ daily buying indicators from these same local sources — so you know not just who the decision-maker is, but when they are in an active buying cycle. Free plan. From $125/month.

Finding APAC decision-makers — method and primary source by market
Market Registry source Job platform Local trade press
Indonesia AHU — directors by PT Kalibrr, Glints Kontan, Bisnis Indonesia
Vietnam National Business Registration Portal Vietnamworks, TopCV Nhip Cau Dau Tu, CafeF
Thailand DBD — juristic persons JobsDB, JobThai Krungthep Turakij
South Korea DART — financial disclosures JobKorea, Saramin The Bell, Hankyung
Japan NTA Corporate Number Rikunabi, Mynavi Nikkei Business
India MCA — company directors Naukri, TimesJobs The Ken, VCCircle
Singapore ACRA — directors and shareholders LinkedIn, MyCareersFuture Business Times, CNA Business
For Teams Prospecting APAC
Decision-Maker Data From
Local Sources in 130+ Countries
Pubrio indexes local business registries, regional job platforms, local-language trade press, and company website data — returning verified contacts for APAC companies that don't appear in Apollo or LinkedIn-based tools.
Frequently Asked Questions
Questions about finding B2B decision-makers in APAC
Why doesn't LinkedIn work well for finding APAC decision-makers?
Southeast Asia accounts for only 6.9% of global LinkedIn membership despite generating 78% of global B2B e-commerce GMV. Singapore has approximately 50% LinkedIn population penetration — Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand are a fraction of this. Most mid-market manufacturers, distributors, and service companies in these markets either don't have LinkedIn profiles or have profiles too sparse to be useful for prospecting. Decision-makers in non-Anglophone markets generally generate their professional footprint through local registries, regional job platforms, and local-language trade press — none of which LinkedIn indexes.
What is the fastest way to find a decision-maker at an APAC company?
For most markets: start with the local business registry (AHU for Indonesia, SSM for Malaysia, DBD for Thailand, ACRA for Singapore) to confirm the company's registered directors. Cross-reference with regional job platforms to identify active hiring managers. If the company has been covered in local-language trade press, that often names the decision-maker by title. For mid-market companies where manual research is impractical at scale, Pubrio indexes all these sources and returns verified contacts directly.
How do regional job platforms help find decision-makers?
Job postings reveal the organizational structure around a decision-maker even when the decision-maker themselves is not publicly visible. A posting for "Compliance Manager — reporting to CFO" identifies the CFO as the budget holder. A posting for "Sales Director — reporting to COO" identifies the COO. In markets like Vietnam, Indonesia, and India, mid-market companies post on Vietnamworks, Kalibrr, and Naukri weeks before any equivalent signal appears on LinkedIn — so the contact intelligence is both more detailed and more timely.
Does searching in local languages really return more contacts?
Yes — significantly. Teams prospecting non-English APAC markets see 2–3x more contacts when searches include native-language equivalent titles. "Head of Procurement" in Japanese (調達部長), Korean (구매팀장), Vietnamese (Trưởng phòng mua hàng), or Bahasa Indonesia (Kepala Pengadaan) returns a substantially larger result set from local sources than the English title alone. This applies to job board searches, registry lookups, and local-language web searches for company leadership pages.
How does Pubrio find decision-makers in APAC?
Pubrio indexes local business registries (AHU, SSM, DBD, DART, NTA, ACRA, MCA), regional job platforms (Kalibrr, Glints, Vietnamworks, JobsDB, Naukri, JobKorea, Rikunabi), and local-language trade press across 130+ countries. When you search for a company in Pubrio, the contact record is built from these locally-sourced inputs — not LinkedIn or English-language web crawls. The result is verified decision-maker contacts for mid-market APAC companies that return empty in Apollo, ZoomInfo, and LinkedIn Sales Navigator.